On Non-Monogamy: Do Open Relationships Work?

By: Polly Parker (View Profile)

Non-monogamy is about one thing—sex. And sex is good. And sex with different people—either concurrently or over the course of a lifetime—is good too. Sex is so good that some people are addicted to it. (Have you ever heard of someone being addicted to something that isn’t good for you? Addiction = bad.) Sex makes people do crazy things and it makes people feel amazing things. I love it just as much as anyone else, but there is more to life than sex.

I am pretty sure that the words on your deathbed won’t be “I wish I had had more sex with more people.” Maybe if you are a pervert, or if you didn’t get much action in your life, you would say that, but most people wouldn’t. Most people would say that they would have spent more time with their families, or that they wished they had worked less. They want more time with their wives, or they regret not pursuing a dream. Unless someone is being a smartass on his deathbed, he’s not going to even think about sex when his number’s up.

I live in San Francisco. Non-monogamy (or polyamory as it is called here) is a big topic in the city. It’s not just the gays talking about it; straight folks are into open relationships too. Polyamory is not just a straight, gay, queer, bi, or trans issue. Out here, everybody’s doing it. And if everyone is doing it here, then it’s probably already in or coming to a town near you.

Here’s the definition of monogamy:

NOUN:

1 archaic : the practice of marrying only once during a lifetime 2 : the state or custom of being married to one person at a time 3 : the condition or practice of having a single mate during a period of time

Notice anything? Right off the bat, Webster’s is linking monogamy to marriage, and they should, because monogamy comes from monos (alone, single) + gamos (marriage). Monogamy used to be about being with one person forever, and now it’s been updated to mean the state or “custom” of being married to one person at a time. The logical opposite of monogamy is polygamy, being married to more than one person at a time, and not very many people (publicly) support that.

7 readers liked this story.
bookmarks
Comments
posted: 12.14.2008
Paula Thomas
I believe people have sex with multiple partners to purposely keep themselves from becoming emotionally attached to just one person. This way, they always have a fall back plan just in case the one they're trying to love disappoints them. But, they'll never truly find out if someone really loves them unless they take the chance to be monogomous with them. Besides, why get married in the first place? There had to be something there to say "I do" to forsake all others. That's what truly makes Love so Special - saving it for "the one"
posted: 11.13.2008
Marj K
I don't care if people have polyamorous relationships, I just wish they weren't all crazy evangelical about it. Most of the poly people I've met sound like serial killers, "We're just doing what everyone wants to do, but just don't have the guts/strength/balls to do!" No. Some of us do not want that at all. As for me, I'm happily married and monogomous. I think everyone is entitled to their own opinion and if thier relationship makes them happy and isn't hurting, anyone good for them. However, I kinda think open relationships are choosing warm friendship over committed love. However, for some that, combined with lots of sex, is enough.
posted: 08.13.2008
Tom Farris
Sex is different things to different people. Monogamy is healthy and unhealthy and beautiful and confining...depends on the person, the point that person is at in life, the time of night, etc. For some people it's indistinguishable from love...for others it's a hard wired biological response (red wire connected to the red terminal, black wire to the black terminal...off you go). And, I do know one thing...to assert that people never go to their deathbed wishing they "had had more sex with more people” is just flat ass wrong. There's a reason pornography is a multi-billion dollar industry...people like sex (or at least the idea of sex)...with multiple partners a lot.
posted: 05.09.2008
Robert Erikson
It seems arbitrary over history to make one behavior or another by an adult, or among mutually consenting adults, somehow unrightous if not illegal. Polly uninspiringly joins the crowd regarding non-monogamy. Ironically, she reverses when it comes to smoking. There may be more to life than sex but the same tautologically could be said of anything. But history is constant on one account. Sex will not be denied. When it is, perversion festers. Ask abused Catholic alter boys. If sex will not be not denied, then perhaps placing it in solidarity confinement (monogamy) is the best that those-who-want-to-tell-the-rest-of-us-how-to-live can do. Sure, marriage, kids, dogs and a white pickett fence are fine things too. But as variety in our meals, books, work and entertainment need not be a threat to other good things, neither need be the spice of additional sex partners. If monogamy were a golden answer, divorce in monogamous relationships would be uncommon. On MY deathbed...a satiated smile.
posted: 04.21.2008
Sadie
Did anyone else read the subtext that exists throughout this article? I truly believe Polly is not completely sure what she believes. It's as if she spent the many hours that it took her to construct this piece to talk herself into answering the question her article's title asks "Do Open Relationships Work?". She obviously came to the conclusion "No", which is completely baffling to me since she has not even tried it herself, only relied on the judgments she has passed on her "open" friends' relationships. Interesting indeed! ~Sadie confessionsfrommyopenmarriage.blogspot.com/
It feels good to write.

Your stories, musings, and advice are welcome here. We know you've got something to share, so jump in—maybe get a little famous. And don't worry—you can save a draft!

most liked
Loader_buff
Other topics you might appreciate
Travel Body & Soul Play Career & Money Neighborhood & World